We will investigate words that sound the same and often spelled the same with different meaning yet changing from culture too culture. It’s our duty to examine the evidence carefully and unbiasedly. The main point is to give evidence that the Anti-halleluiah doctrine is hooked on Phonetics because it lacks the linguistic study.

The “Anti-halleluiah” doctrine teaches that “IAH” (as used in hallelu-“iah) is the same spelling and pronunciation found in Ancient Egyptian mythology “YAH” and because of this the word should not be associated with the God of the bible. Supporters of the “Anti-halleluiah” doctrine believe when the word YAH is used in correlation to the God of the bible it’s used in error.  The followers also believe “Halleluiah” is worship to the Egyptian god “Yah” and anyone using the word is emphatically worshipping the “Moon god Yah.”  There is a problem with the linguistic prescription given by those following the “Anti-halleluiah” doctrine. There are hundreds of words with roots resembling “YAH.” An order to be consistent in the  linguistic prescription, they will need to create an entire new language free from any pagan roots.  What the “Anti-halleluiah” followers don’t understand is that “Iah” (before “Iah” the late pharaoh’s brother, perhaps within the 5th dynasty took the name) was the normal pronunciation and spelling for the word “moon” and had nothing to do with worship. The word was later adopted by the Egyptian dynasty to reflect deity.

The adoption of words from culture too cultures happens consistently; take the word “Nut” for example, in American culture the word refers to a seed, or some craze person. However, in the early Egyptian culture the word related to an Egyptian goddess. What comes to mind when the word “Bat” is used? Perhaps a type of bird or a piece of sporting equipment used in baseball.  In the early Egyptian culture the word “Bat” related to an Egyptian deity. People long to be “Hap(p)y. But did you know “Hapy” was also an Egyptian deity? These are simple examples of how cultural linguistics can over lap and even the meaning of a word can change for one culture to the other. There is no proof however, that when either of these word are used that the person(s) using them is worshiping a false god.

Etymology is the study of the history of words and their origins and how they change from culture to culture. Etymology studies have proven that sounds, spellings and meanings of words are systematically changed throughout culture. This would indicate that even now new words, sounds and meanings are being added to our existing language much of which has become homophone in genre.

In every culture there are strange word relationships that sound the same but spelled differently. They are called “Homophones.”  Homophones are word related sounds. For example, words like; “our, and hour, buy, by and bye, right, rite and write are connected by sound but differ in meaning. Homophones can sometimes be related in sound and spelling but lack relation in definition. We see this in words like rose and rose, (as a flower and rise). These relations are known as “Homographs,” words that are spelled the same but lack the relation in meaning.

“Homophones and Homographs” are found in every language. However, we notice the lack of vowels usage increases the chance of Homophones and Homographs usage. The Semitic languages are among dialects that lack some vowel usage, therefore, Homophones and Homographs are a large part of the Semitic languages. The biblical Hebrew has close to 2000 cases of homographs words. In light of this, it would be an injustice to associated Hebrew words based on how they are spelled. These are minor stepping stones to remember as we research the history of words and their origins and how they change from culture to culture. The major objectives would be to adhere to the systematical change that affects languages throughout cultures. A good example of this would be the Hebrew word kham-ore’, kham-ore’, translated in the old English language as the “male ass” as in animal.  In our culture the word “ass” has more than one meaning, more so it has become term to belittle or a usage of profanity. These “Homophones and Homographs” exist within a specific language but there are also Homophones and Homographs that exist between languages.  These Homophones and Homographs” are considered historical accidents because the new words are really old words borrowed from another culture. They are identical in the way they’re spelled, but completely different in nature and meaning. This means a word like YAH in the Ancient Semitic language could lose its meaning and adopt another meaning over time with on connection other than spelling.

In this research we believe Homophones and Homographs are a curing factor showing the relationship and traits of culture adaptation and the consistent change in language. The “Anti-halleluiah” doctrine is living proof of the adaptation and change. The believers in the “Anti-halleluiah” has rejected the “IAH” and adapted “JEH” as in “JEH”-OVAH. This would mean the believers in the “Anti-halleluiah” doctrine agree that JEH-OVAH is at the least 50% accurate. In any case, the point of the adaptation of “JEH” over “JAH” proves that sounds, spellings and meanings of words are systematically changed throughout culture. We noted earlier that it would be an injustice to associate Hebrew words based on how they are spelled. For example, “JEH” in the new “halleluieh” can be found in the Deity of Lao-Tien-Yeh the “Father Heaven” and “Great God” of China. We have also found the association of the words “YEH” in Persian mythology to a spirit whore name “YEH”, “she is responsible for the death of the first man Gayomart because at his instigation, she poisoned him” (Encyclopedia Mythical, 2004).

It is note taking to review how the followers of the “Anti-halleluiah” doctrine believe “Halleluiah” is worship to the Egyptian god “Yah” and anyone using the word is emphatically worshipping the “Moon god Yah.”  Well let’s embrace the thought for a moment. Since we find the language parallels between “JEH” in the new “halleluieh” and in China’s “Father Heaven” and Great God and the spirit whore “Jeh” in Persian Methodology. Could the believer’s in the “Anti-halleluiah” doctrine be worshipping the spirit whore “JEH” or the “Father Heaven” of China by their own establishment?   Are they really saying, praise the spirit whore JEH? Perhaps, they are really worshipping the “Great God” of China.

In deeper studies, an observation of the word “Israel” reveals more linguistic “Homophones and Homographs” colliding. For instance, the biblical name Jacob was changed to “Israel” which means “God prevails”. The word God in “Israel” is pronounced “EL” in the Hebrew language. “EL” is found in words like Mehujael “smitten by God”, Mahalaleel “praise of God”, and  Bethel “house of God”. On the other hand, “EL” is also associated with the Canaanite religion.  The Canaanites worshipped “EL” the “Father of creation”, and the Canaanite religion is the religion of Baal worship, a false religion according to the bible.

Since the supporters of the “Anti-halleluiah” doctrine believe when the word YAH is used in correlation to the God of the bible it’s used in error, they must also believe that “EL” is a corruption. This means those following the “Anti-halleluiah” doctrine must cease from using the name “Israel”. In this we truly understand what a difficult linguistic polemic the followers of the “Anti-halleluiah” doctrine have.  So what will it be, “Isra-yeh”? How many words must be change? Again the evidence shows how the supporters of the “Anti-halleluiah” doctrine lack consistency.

Furthermore, during any given Sunday service it is typical to hear someone say AMEN. Amen is a way the congregation communicate that they’re following the message, that is to say they agree. In both the Hebrew and Greek languages Amen is understood as either; verily, truly, amen, or so be it. In the book of the Revelation of Jesus Christ God is noted as “The Amen”.  Nevertheless, what you may not know about Amen is the word is also found in Ancient Egyptian mythology. Amen (Ancient Egyptian mythology) is known as Amon and Amun a self-created god, without mother and without father and known as the father or king of all gods. Now applying the “Anti-halleluiah” teaching on the word “YAH” to “AMEN”, would indicate that everyone using the word Amen is in fact worshiping the SUN.  Do the “Anti-halleluiah” followers use Amen? If so, they condemn themselves.

The Anti-halleluiah doctrine is drastically hooked on Phonetics and must begin the genesis of a new language or face the facts. The “Anti-halleluiah” doctrine is a “NEW” invention created less than 50 years ago.  NO Apostle or prophet ever taught it, so why must anyone believe it? You don’t. If you look hard enough you’re bound to find something. So it is with the “Anti-halleluiah” doctrine. There are many words in the bible and in our modern language that can be distorted just as we witness with the “Anti-halleluiah” doctrine. In every culture there are strange word relationships that sound the same but spelled differently and spelled the same and sound the same but differ in meaning. As long as this is ignored there will continually be false doctrines like “Anti-halleluiah”.

It’s really simple, fornication is illegal sex or sex outside of marriage; same sex relations,  opposite sex relations , sex with animals and even sex with oneself. Fornication is also sex in the fashion of one’s mind, porn, dolls and all form of sex outside of the will of God.

Adultery is sex with someone outside of an existing marriage covenant; it’s the actual act of sexually breaking the marriage covenant by one of the partners in the covenant of marriage.

Fornication and Adultery will often overlap. How so? If a married person leaves the holy relationship of marriage and have sex with someone else, the act is both fornication and adultery. It’s fornication because the sex act is illegal because there is no marriage covenant between the couple engaging in the sexual act, and it’s adultery because the existing marriage covenant has been broken by the unfaithful spouse.

Many minsters hold the doctrine that fornication can only be committed by single people, but we must remember fornication is much broader. Fornication is defined as illegal sex of all kinds. In Paul’s writing to the Corinthian church he wrote; “It is reported commonly that there is fornication among you, and such fornication as is not so much as named among the Gentiles, that one should have his father’s wife.”

Note: The relationship between a son and his father wife is considered to be fornication.

The relationship is called fornication because it’s illegal sex outside of marriage. This will help us to understand Jesus teaching on the subject as he mentions the overlapping of fornication and adultery. “But I say unto you, that whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causes her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced commit adultery.”

In this chapter fornication means illegal sexual intercourse demonstrating that a married person can commit fornication. He also proves that a single person can commit adultery by saying “Whosoever shall marry her that is divorced commit adultery.”

In ending fornication is illegal sex of all sorts and adultery is sex with someone outside of an existing marriage covenant and although fornication and adultery overlaps at times, when clearly understood the confusion is erased.

Furthermore, it’s only natural for those conformists to stoop to name calling and accusations, it’s merely a defense mechanism concealing the fact they won’t think for themselves. You don’t have to be Ben Carson or Nikola Tesla to recognize that the Anti-Alleluia doctrine is about as real as Chitty Chitty Bang Bang. The 1970′s slogan of the United Negro College Fund is in line, “A mind is a terrible thing to waste.”

This is my proposal to the emails. I’d like for those anonymous persons to leave the intuitions of others and DO YOUR own research and write your own article on the subject. Secondly, I would like for those same anonymous persons to answer the questions I offer’s in the articles. Thirdly, you must think for yourself, no help from your spiritual adviser. This means no quotes or links to other sites.

In ending, until my proposal is met, keep your emails.

Who is the mysterious anti-Christ of the end times? Since the mystery begun folks have tried extremely hard to unlock this identity code. In the past many held the belief that Nero was the mysterious anti-Christ.  In the time of the raise of Nazism, Hitler’s psychotic behavior leaded others to place him as the anti-Christ. In our modern day, people have labeled Presidents, Roman Catholic Popes, and certain Companies anti-Christ

There’s a passage in the bible that says, “Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day (of the LORD) shall not come, except there comes a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition.”

This passage was written by Paul the apostle somewhere during the time 50 A.D, and it declares that the anti-Christ will be exposed. We don’t have to run around guessing his identity, at the appointed time he will be revealed. The saints of God will know for sure who he is by the number of his name. Now if we tried really hard the number if his name could apply to anyone. But if we wait for the LORD to reveal who the man of sin is we can save a lot of wasted time.

Personally, I don’t believe we will have any problems identifying the man of sin in the day he is revealed by the LORD, all we would have to do is confirm God’s reveration by the number of his name. This takes away the guess work.

 In an espousal-ship  you have vows, a contract, witnesses and a purchasing of the bride with some sort of token. In this espousal relationship the two are called husband and wife, with only the bridegroom fetching his bride away to complete the marriage ceremony, and this relationship can only be broken with a bill of divorce.   The dictionary describes marriage as the legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife, which is clearly the case in the Jewish tradition during the espousal.

 On the other hand, the American engagement, there are no vows, no contract, or no witnesses, and the couples are regarded as to be married.  Thus, the American engagement isn’t recognized as a legal union of a man and woman and the engagement relationship can be broken for any reason without a bill of divorce. This is certainly not the case with espousal-ship; the relationship is binding by the exchange of vows, the contract, and the witnesses. To be honest, there is simply no difference between an actual traditional American marriage ceremony, and the Jewish espousal-ship. When we marry here in America, we hold a ceremony, where vows are exchanged and a contract is sign and witnesses are present, afterwards the couple is off to what is called a “honeymoon”. The honeymoon is where we “supposedly” (as the Jewish do) seal the marriage. But here is the point. Most people don’t believe that if an American spouse is unfaithful after the ceremony, but before the honeymoon, the marriage is void. 

 Of course not, most people believe once the couple has exchange vows, the contract has been singed, and the witnesses having witness the ceremony the couple is completely husband and wife and the relationship is binding. Why don’t we hold the same view for the Jews? Because we are lead to interpret the ancient by the present, and not the present by the ancient.  

 The Jewish wedding is a two part ceremony with the first part being the espousal (wedding vows, or “I do’s contract and witnesses and token) and then about one or two years the second part took place which completes the ceremony. The second part deals with the husband finally taking his wife home. However, durng the second part there is no need for contracts, vows, or a minister because the couple is already considered married. In fact, if the husband sought to take his wife immediately after completing the first half of the ceremony he could, and no sin would be committed. Now if there was some unknown incompletion in the marriage that kept them from being 100% husband and wife, he couldn’t take her right away. The first part of the ceremony isn’t weaker than the second. The marriage is bound by the first part not the second.  The first part of the ceremony gives the couple the right to be joined in physical relationship. The first part of the ceremony gives the couple the right to be called “Husband and Wife”.  

 However, if unfaithfulness is discovered durng the course of the relation, either durng the espousal-ship or after the completion of the ceremony the same punishment is given to the husband or the wife that comments fornication. 

 The punishment given after the ceremony is completed:

  (Lev 20:10)  “If a man commits adultery with another man’s wife–the wife, say, of his neighbor–both the man and the woman, the adulterer and adulteress, must be put to death”.

(Deu 22:22) “If a man be found lying with a woman married to an husband, then they shall both of them die, both the man that lay with the woman, and the woman: so shalt thou put away evil from Israel”.

 The punishment given before the ceremony is completed, but durng the espousal:

 (Deu 22:23-24)  “If a damsel that is a virgin be betrothed unto an husband, and a man find her in the city, and lie with her; Then ye shall bring them both out unto the gate of that city, and ye shall stone them with stones that they die; the damsel, because she cried not, being in the city; and the man, because he hath humbled his neighbour’s wife: so thou shalt put away evil from among you”.

 Therefore in the case of Joseph and Mary, the penalty for such a crime was death. However, Joseph being a good man not wanting to disgrace Mary publicly made plans to break the engagement privately. The law allowed him to put her to death, and the law also allowed him to give her a bill of divorcement. It seems Joseph being a good man not wanting to disgrace Mary publicly, plan to end the marriage ceremony by giving Mary a bill of divorcement.  The same thing happen with the woman brought to Jesus for being caught in the acted of adultery. The fullness of the law sentence her to death, but the LORD Jesus allows her to go free commanding her to sin no more.

    Elder Walker is the pastor of the Apostolic Ministries of America, Inc. located in Titusville, FL. The Apostolic Ministries of America Inc. is one of the many branches of the Church of the Lord Jesus Christ of the Apostolic Faith where S. C. Johnson, (who passed away February 22, 1961) was pastor.

 “Bishop S.C. Johnson has being the first modern day apostle to preach this issue to the whole world.” – Chief Elder.  The bible Apostles taught the “Son of God,” would suffer, die and rise on the third day. The Refuge/Frist Church of our Lord” organization rejects the idea that “The Son” rose from the grave and when into heaven. The Refuge/Frist Church of our Lord” organization believes the son cease to be the son at the cross.

   The way God did this thing is the way it is and there is nothing neither you, nor anyone else can do about it. It is the word of God and that is that! : And No, the son of God does not exist in heaven now. – Chief Elder.

    In accord with the testimonies of the Lord Jesus and his apostles, the “Son-ship” would go beyond the grave. “The Son of man (The son of God) must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be slain, and be raised the third day.”  

   In accord with all the scriptures the son will:

• Suffer
• Be rejected
• Be slain
• Rise on the third day
• Return to the father
• Return to earth  to judge

    As we review these facts we must remember the correlation of the “Son of God,” “Son of Man” and “The Christ” which identifies his humanity. The Lord Jesus asked has disciples a very important question, saying, who do men say that I the Son of man am?  And they said, some say that you are John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremiah, or one of the prophets. But Jesus asked them, but who do you say I am? And Simon Peter answered and said, you are the Christ, the Son of the living God. And Jesus answered and said unto him, blessed are you, Simon

 Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto you, but my Father which is in heaven. (Mat 16:13-17)

     This passage is specific; The “Son of man” is the “Christ” the “Son of the Living God.” This would indicate that there’s no “Christ” without a son. NO “Son” NO “Christ.” The question then must be asked; did “Christ” rise from the grave and go into heaven?  Remember, the “Son of man” is the “Christ” the “Son of the Living God.”  The Apostle Paul makes this statement on the subject; “If Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins.” (1Co 15:17) And if “Christ” did rise from the grave then so did the “Son of the Living God.”  If one fell to understand the correlation then it is possible to miss the mark of sound doctrine. The “Son of man” is the “Christ” the “Son of the Living God.”

     The argument: “No, the son of God does not exist in heaven now. Do you not understand that the Begotten Son of God was blood and flesh and that which the Virgin Mary gave birth to and that it was our Passover, our Sacrifice that was set forth according to the law of God which as set in the House of Levi and that sacrifice was totally consumed, there was nothing left of the Passover Sacrifice it was totally consumed according to God’s law and there was never ever anything left of it; not even one bone, it was consumed!! It was sacrificed and that sacrifice had to be in totality for it was a sin sacrifice and for sin not to exist; to be blotted out; removed from our records; the sacrifice had to be totally consumed, nothing could be left of it. This was the order given to the Son of God (that which was flesh and blood) and He had to be totally consumed in order to take away the sins of the world. Behold the Lamb of God, who taketh away the sins of the world. And unless that sin sacrifice is totally consumed, sin will still exist. Therefore it was necessary to totally consume all of the Begotten Son of God so that all our sins are totally blotted out, that they can be no more written/visible on our individual record; instead they are condemned in His flesh and are no more because the sacrifice is no more. There is nothing left of the sacrifice to harbor sin.” –Elder Walker

     The consumption theory sounds wonderful, but we must accept it for what it is, a theory. There were many offering post law and in the law that were received by God without consumption, and to form a doctrine base on a piece of passage is a mistake. The Israelites were told to eat the flesh of the Passover with unleavened bread and bitter herbs. The Passover could not be eaten raw, sodden at all with water, but roasted with fire: The head with his legs, and with the inward parts.

    The Israelites were instructed to eat the Passover leaving nothing for the morning. However, it’s important to note the rest of the verse which says; “And that which remained of it until the morning you shall burn with fire”. There were remains and those remains had to be burned with fire the next day; which in itself conflicts the doctrine “No son of God in heaven now.” The bible doesn’t teach a correlation between the consumption of the Passover in the Old Testament and the existence of the Son of God. The biblical parallel explains how Christ the lamb was killed on fourteenth day of the first month as instructed in the law. The lamb was killed by the Israelite and so was our Lord when Pontius Pilate desired to release him, but the Jews committed him to death. The Israelite roasted the lamb with fire, and fire is the intense suffering our LORD endured. The Israelite ate the lamb with bitter herbs which again speaks of the bitter suffering of our LORD. The lamb had to be eaten before the next day, and our LORD was not allowed to remain on the cross till the next day because of the high Sabbath, and that is the reason the Israelite ate the Passover with haste.         

    In accord with all the scriptures the son will:

• Suffer
• Be rejected
• Be slain
• Rise on the third day
• Return to the father
• Return to earth  to judge

     The “Son of man” is the “Christ” the “Son of the Living God.” If there’s no son then there is on CHRIST. And if there’s no Christ we are yet in sin and have become liars because we claim we are saved when there is no CHRIST. 

     For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he (Christ) was buried, and that he (Christ) rose again the third day according to the scriptures. And Paul, as his manner was, went in unto them, and three Sabbath days reasoned with them out of the scriptures, Opening and alleging, that Christ must needs have suffered, and risen again from the dead; and that this Jesus, whom I preach unto you, is Christ. (Act 17:2-3 1Co 15:3-4)

  The Son of man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, and be crucified, and the third day rise again. And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. I tell you that he will avenge them speedily. Nevertheless when the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth? Be ye therefore ready also: for the Son of man cometh at an hour when ye think not. (Luke 24:7 Luke 21:27 Luke 18:8 Luke 12:40)

 Luke 9:22 Saying, The Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be slain, and be raised the third day.

 Matthew 12:40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

  And unto the angel of the church in Thyatira write; These things saith the Son of God, who hath his eyes like unto a flame of fire, and his feet are like fine brass;

I know thy works, and charity, and service, and faith, and thy patience, and thy works; and the last to be more than the first. (Rev 2:18-19)

  Whosoever shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwelleth in him, and he in God. And straightway he preached Christ in the synagogues, that he is the Son of God. Who is he that overcomes the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God? (Acts 9:20 1John 5:5 1John 4:15)

The scripture doesn’t support the “No Son of God in heaven now” doctrine. There are simply too many scriptures opposing its view. A well thought out theory, is still a theory when there’s no hard evidence. We can’t begin to fight so hard against falsehood that we knock ourselves out of the truth. A lie will always be a lie no matter how many times it’s repeated, and a lie will always be a lie regardless of its sincere beginning.

     There are many words in our society that hold pagan origins. The days of the week and most of months of the year are pagan in origin. The names of the planets in our solar system and common names like “Gary”, “Donna”, “Robert”, William” and “Art” are pagan. The English language is a combination of languages with Germanic roots.  This means most of the words we speak from day to day have some pagan origin. Do people need to change their names, addresses, cities, states, or employment to fit the word game?  What about the persons driving cars named after Gods like: Mercury, Apollo, Phoenix, Odyssey, Titan or Saturn, (Greek Gods) should they sell? The American dollar bills are loaded with symbols of idols and witchcraft; do we burn them now or later?  If anyone works for the companies “NIKE”  “Amazon” or “Pandora” (Greek Gods) should they quite?  Is it safe to use “Dove soap”, it was inspired by Aphrodite the Greek Goddess?  Is it safe to chew Trident gum, it’s connected to Greek mythology? What if someone needed help with directions, would it be wrong to buy an “Atlas”?  Is it a sin to buy Ajax, or ammonia? It’s named after the Egyptian god.  What about “AMEND” or “AMERCAN”?  Should we avoid “YAH-OO”?  What about the word “victory”? Can we say it? It’s possibly wrong to be called a “mentor”, since that’s Greek mythology. It’s probably time you transfer schools if the mascot is named after Greek mythology like: Titans, Spartans, Phoenix, Trojans, or Griffons. But make sure you do your homework; most schools are under Greek myths.

   The men behind the word game never thought the idea through. If they are going to be consistence they have to dissect every word in our modern language. People with names like “Aurora” “Apollo” “Juno” “Midas” “Charon” would need to change their names. The people in other countries with names like associated with their culture must be forced to choose other name unassociated with gods. 

     In the Aztec world “Chic” has an association with the Gods. So be carful eating “CHIC-KEN”! If someone searched enough that would discovery that Aztec has many Gods with names closely related to word we use every day.   The word “Amim” means “people” in the Hebrew tongue, but in the “Aztec” world it was associated it the fish god.  The list is unending.

    This issue won’t be resolved through word search, but through understanding. Words that sound the same and even spelled the same aren’t always from the same roots. And even if they are, how can we fix the language diversity crisis?  But “If men are allowed to play games with words in the bible, they will eventually destroy the faith.”

Pastor Gary Reckart, an over opinionated eccentric minister known for his arrogance and oftentimes controversial positions, publish an article further proving just how argumentative he endeavors to be with his new doctrinal position on the word “Alleluia”.  I often watch in awe as Pastor Reckart Texas Chainsaw Massacres the bible with his weak inventions of opinions, not to mention those criminal attacks against individuals that don’t see eye to eye with him.  Trivial you think? Perhaps! Insane maybe, until you’ve read Pastor Reckart’s new article you won’t know the depth of it.

In this article I will demonstrate just how pathetic Pastor Reckart anti-Alleluia promotional meltdown really is. Pastor Reckart previously taught and held the position that the word Alleluia is a corruption and now ambitiously fueled by the thought of being the first to publish a new doctrine Pastor Reckart is now claiming not only is Alleluia is a corruption but the true interpretation of the word is “Praise Lucifer”.  As delirious as it may seem, Pastor Reckart’s chronic fear of the word Alleluia stems from his view of the word Lucifer in which he believes is now the root word of Alleluia.

Edit: Dec, 2011
(This section is edited to provide the appropriate apology to pastor Reckart. After a full investigation of the conversation over the topic Hallelujah, (whether or not pastor Reckart preached the message before the time in question) I found that I miss understood the message I had with the person in question. It wasn’t the “Yah” in Hallelujah in connection to the moon God. So this edited confirms that pastor Reckart indeed held the message before the time spoken of. However, the term was Hallellu-jesus that was the original message preached and not the Yah” in Hallelujah.  So I am extending my apology to pastor Reckart of this matter.   
This apology to pastor Reckart in strictly dealing with the misunderstood message I posted on this site. This apology in no way approves the message pastor Reckart holds on “Anti-halleluiah”, it is simply an apology for the misunderstanding I posted about “Yah” in Hallelujah was preached by a young minister before him. Instead it was the term  Hallellu-jesus.)

The Halleluiah doctrine is hooked on phonetics (——CLICK)

Even worst, what Pastor Reckart doesn’t want HIS FOLLWERS to come to the understanding that many of Prophets, Kings and rulers over the house of Israel have names associated with the name “IAH” such as,  Nehem-iah, Uzz-iah, Isa-iah, Jerem-iah, Jos-iah, Obad-iah, Zephan-iah Shemar-iah  Abi-jah, Hezek-iah, Mica-iah, and Azar-iah.

At any rate, in the attempt to show just how unstable and dangerously outrageous this behavior can be, I will use Pastor Reckart’s anti-Alleluia theology in this article to prove the danger it holds. Music is translated in the scriptures as “Song” and the Hebrew word for “Song” is shı̂yr  shı̂yrâh. What you possibly didn’t know is the word MUSIC is long for MUSE. MUSE is found once the bible. “I muse on the work of thy hands”. (Psa 143:5) The word means to think or to mediate.

The word Rah in “Shı̂yrâh” is pronounce“ Ra‛ a” is translated  “Evil”  and “ Ra‛ a is  construed  as the Egyptian sun God, suggesting the word “SONG” mean to think on “RAH” meditating on the “Evil” or the  Egyptian sun God. This would mean according to Pastor Reckart’s theory words,  words like Naarah, Sarah, Sheerah,  Sapphira and Serah are corruptions  and ought be eliminated from both the bible and our speech and every time we sing we are  meditating on the “Evil”

It gets worst, the name Seth is a well know Egyptian God alone side the God “NUN” which happens to be the name of the father of Joshua and Joshua is also interpreted Jesus.  This would mean according to Pastor Reckart’s theory of play on words, Jesus father is NUN the Egyptian God. It is also understood from Nun (Nu) that Ra created himself, Nun was thought to be the father of Ra, who was known as the father of the gods. Ra created evil this in turn is where Seth originated. Seth is the God of Chaos.

Now, if you’re still following the Reckart theory you should understand this, the prophet Isaiah confesses that GOD created “EVIL” or “RA”. This can only mean when we take into consideration Pastor Reckart’s doctrine that “NUN” the father of Jesus (who we know as God) created himself “OUT” of “RA” or “EVIL” and so “EVIL” is the father Jesus the origin Seth the God of Chaos and every living substance. The Pastor Reckart methodology is as tiresome as Minister Louis Farrakhan sermon on the number 19 and only works when it is convenient for its creator. However, if you found yourself asking :What are you talking about? Shhhhh! This is the Reckart’s way, ask no questions.

The truth is however, in every language there are words relations called homonym closely related in sound but far from one another in meaning. Sometimes these words can have the same spelling and pronunciation and yet have two totally different meanings. For example, in the Hebrew language the word “Anger” is pronounced “’Aph”. “’Aph” pronunciation is also how you would say the conjunction “Also” “Furthermore” and “Indeed”, but it is clearly understood that these words are readily determine in the sentence at the time they are used.

Hebrew Homonym

• “Bâlaq”  =   to lay waste
• “Bâlâq” =  “devastator”
• Belô = tribute
• Belô’ = worn out things, rags
• Tamrûr =bitterness
• Tamrûr = guidepost, markers
• Tâm = complete, perfect
• Tâm = there
• Tôr = dove
• Tôr = circlet, plait
• Tâvâh = scrabble, limit, mark, make or set a mark
• Tâvâh = to pain, wound, trouble, cause pain
• Têbêl  = World
• Tebel = confusion
• Shethı̂y = a drinking
• Shethı̂y = warp, woven material
• Shêth = Seth Adam son
• Shêth = Six
• Shêth = seat of body, buttocks

As a matter of opinion, Pastor Reckart will deliberately create falsehood if it meant two things, if the false doctrine he created will destroy a particular doctrine he is fight at the time, and second, if he will be glorified. Anyone with the slightest decency of truth will understand the falsehood behind the Anti- Hallelujah doctrine. Once we allow men to play with words like this, they will eventually destroy everything we believe in their root word scrutinizing.

In the past pants have been referred to as breeches, trousers, and trews. Today women can choose from full leg, straight leg, capris, gauchos, jeans, and tailored suits. However, women were far behind men in taking to the tradition of the fashion staple we call pants.

There is record of 4th Century Persian women wearing pants but that trend did not really catch on or travel to the Western World at that time. The first big rumblings of women wearing pants occurred at the end of the Victorian period. Ladies were getting a bit tired of heavy full skirts, whalebone corsets, cumbersome padding, bustles, and those multi-layered petticoats. Realistically and figuratively the garments were trapping women, keeping them down. Bloomers were soon introduced. Named after feminist advocate Amelia Jenks Bloomer, the outfit consisted of a knee length full skirt worn with full cut trousers underneath. Bloomers did not really become popular.

The next attempt at bringing pants into the women’s fashion world was with the 1880’s and 1890’s bicycle outfit. Knee length knickerbockers were worn with a split wide skirt and stockings. Knickerbockers, or knickers, are full length breeches with a band just below the knee. The world of fashion tagged this outfit as un-ladylike and it did not become popular, either.

Then came World War I. Women had to go into the factories to work the jobs of the absent men. They pulled back their hair and pulled off their skirts. Loose pants and pants similar to riding pants became part of the work attire. Lounge pj’s were often worn in the evening. Hollywood put their stamp of approval on pants when Marlene Dietrich donned a pair in the movie Morocco. When World War II began, Rosie the Riveter was seen on posters all over the country wearing overalls.

Variations of the traditional pant’s style exist. In 1961 Breakfast at Tiffany’s was released. The world began to mimic Audrey Hepburn’s costume of black capris. Her character, Holly Golightly, defined the Hepburn style. Later Marilyn Monroe, Annette Funicello, and Sandra Dee all were photographed wearing capris. Gauchos became popular in the late 1970’s and seem to be back in style again.

Some people have been slow to accept women in pants. When I dress up I always go for a dress, not pants. And I just can’t seem to bring myself to wear pants to church. But pants are an integral part of my wardrobe and well as millions of other women’s wardrobe. It is hard to believe that as recently as a century ago it was a misdemeanor for a person to wear clothes not “of their sex.” California did not make it legal for women to wear pants to the work place until 1995! Thank goodness for jeans, capris, and sweat pants as well as the women’s business suit. When I want to pull a power play or simply lounge at home; I reach for my pants every single time.  – Lifestyle

The world may change but God never changes! -CLARK

The circumcision of the flesh is not the covenant.

Traditionally many are being taught (especially in end time prophesies) that God made an unconditional covenant of circumcision of the flesh with Abraham. This unfortunately binds God to a promise forever regardless of the actions and hearts of the people. Therefore joining God to a unfulfilled promise that he must accomplish in Israel although they may continue to reject him. Now God indeed made a promise or a covenant with Abraham. However, it was neither, a promise of circumcision after the flesh, or void of conditions. Some simple research would reveal the shocking reality that God’s promises are all base on conditions. Such as, the promise that he made with Adam. Adam could preserve a precious covenant of everlasting life. But in order for him to maintain this promise he would have to successfully obey the word of God by reframing himself from the forbidden tree. Likewise, the promises God made with Abraham were promises base conditions.

For it is written:
“And when Abram was ninety years old and nine, the LORD appeared to Abram, and said unto him, I am the Almighty God; walk before me, and be thou perfect.” (Genesis 17:1) “Condition”

And I will make my covenant between me and thee, and will multiply thee exceedingly. (Genesis 17:2) “Promise”

Of course, I could spend a great deal exposing the unconditional promise doctrine. But since the focus point is circumcision, I will spear the reader. Brother Paul spent a massive amount of time relating circumcision to the churches. Here is a quote from one of his letter to the Romans congregation.

“Abraham received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised: that he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them also.” -Apostle Paul-(Romans 4:11)

As a result of Paul letter to the church we’ve learn that the circumcision of the flesh is not the covenant. But instead circumcision was given to Abraham as a sign, mark, or a symbol. And God said to Abraham, “And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin; and it shall be a token of the covenant betwixt me and you.” Paul said the exact same thing “Abraham received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised”

Therefore the circumcision made with hands was merely a shadow of what God had and would complete in all that would place their total trust in him. The circumcision launch us forward to revelation of Christ and rested securely in his finish work at the cross. The true circumcision finds its establishment at his resurrection, and its purpose in the pouring out of the Holy Ghost at the starting of the church. Every believer including Angels had to have their faith in this work of God in order to be saved.

The True Circumcision

In the letter of the Acts of the Apostles a great conflict arose over whether gentiles should be instructed to be circumcised. For some religious law-keeping Jews begin preaching, “Unless the gentiles take on the circumcision they could not be saved.” After considering this doctrine, the Apostles and Elders announce this statement to be wrong. By sending words to the churches that the gentiles should only abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood. To place any more then this on them would place a yoke on them that even the fathers before them could not uphold (Acts 15: 1-29).

Certainly their conversation inspired Paul to write about circumcision in his letter to the Church in Roman. We can imagine this issue was very popular in his day. For many Christians were being deceived by law-keeping Jews. In as must as many of them left their faith in Christ to obtain salvation through the Law. Paul was aware of this and addressed the assemble at Roman saying.

Romans 2:25 For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law: but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision.

Romans 2:26 Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

Romans 2:27 And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfill the law, judge thee, who by the letter and circumcision dost transgress the law?

Romans 2:28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:

Romans 2:29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.

Faith in Jesus Messiah have become the very image of the true circumcision made without hands in putting off the body of the sins. Through Repentance, baptism in Jesus name and the infilling power of the Holy Ghost we fulfill the righteousness of the Law in Christ

(Col 2:9) For in him dwelled all the fullness of the Godhead bodily.

(Col 2:10) And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power:

(Col 2:11) In whom also ye are circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ:

(Col 2:12) Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead.

Col 2:13 And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses;

Col 2:14 Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;

Col 2:15 And having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it.

Those who place their faith in Jesus have become the Children of Abraham. Christ said to the Jewish rulers, If Abraham was your father you do the works of Abraham. But you’re the children of your father the Devil. Our faith in Jesus is counted to us as righteousness and the seed of Abraham and is the revelation of our circumcision. We don’t run after the signs, but rest in the victorious finish work of our savior and God and the cross. Therefore we have entered the temple prepared and approved of God. Now we are able to worship him in spirit, and truth with a clean hands and a pure heart.

For we (the church) are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.
Philippians 3:3

Galatians 3:29 And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.

The carnal Circumcision of the flesh has no power saved them who put there trust in it. Which have already been proven. But for further evidence, let’s recall the faithful of GOD.

Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, by which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts: and by it he being dead yet speaks. Did God receive his gift while in uncircumcision, or was he circumcised. But while he was still uncircumcised in he flesh God receive his gift proclaiming him righteous.

Enoch a man of God, was translated and was seen no more. For the scriptures confess he walked with GOD, His translation, did it come while he was circumcised in the flesh or uncircumcised? Enoch was yet uncircumcised when he defeated death through faith.
Noah, being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear, prepared an ark to the saving of his house; by the which he condemned the world. For the scriptures say Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God. Yet he was uncircumcised in his flesh when these things took place.

Summary : The standard of circumcision has always existed since the beginning. We notice how God separated the light from darkness, thus proving the cutting away of sin, (darkness) from righteousness (light) was God’s desire for even nature. For it’s not that with is spiritual that comes first but that which is natural. Paul said : For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse (Romans 1:20). The faith of Abraham show us a perfect example, of passion and desires to separate from sin to practice righteousness. By the same faith we enter the perfect circumcised (sinless) body of Jesus Christ, and continue to circumcised our minds from all worldliness. Law-keepers, and law-breakers can only be saved after this fashion. Their hearts must be open to except Jesus as their Messiah or suffer everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord. The church leaders are to proclaim this truth by preaching repentance and baptism, confirms God’s will for all to come out from among the world and be a separate people. That men might live in the circumcision of faith and free will toward God. The true Covenant of Circumcision.