How to get RICH quick!

Q: Dear Elder Clark, there’s a lot of preaching in the churches about prosperity . Is it wrong to be rich in this life? If not, what’s wrong with the message of prosperity?

A: No there is no sin in being rich in this world. However, the scriptures “Charge them that are rich in this world, that they be not high-minded, nor trust in uncertain riches, but in the living God, who gives us richly all things to enjoy; That they do good, that they be rich in good works, ready to distribute, willing to communicate; Laying up in store for themselves a good foundation against the time to come, that they may lay hold on eternal life”.  (Tim 6:17-19)

But godliness with contentment is great gain. For we brought nothing into this world, and it is certain we can carry nothing out and having food and raiment let us be therewith content. But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition. For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows. But thou, O man of God, flee these things; and follow after righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, meekness. (1Tim 6:6-11)

Thus, the Apostles taught true prosperity was living a godly life through obedience to God. “If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness; he is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings, perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself”. (1Ti 6:3-5) The problem with the message in the prosperity church is gain is godliness, in which the bible instructs us to withdraw ourselves from these ministers.

I’ve seen ministers preaching worldly prosperity while many of the people in there congregation aren’t even save. I can carless whether or not your bank book is balance when your soul is on it way to hell. For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?  The church is not against men having money it is against men teaching gain is godliness and wealth some how make one closer to God. The bible teaches “Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers; But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot.” (1Pe 1:18-19)

If any minister teaches in order for you to receive a blessing you have to sow a seed into their ministry, run and don’t look back. The true blessing of the LORD is living a godly life, “Unto you first God, having raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities. (Act 3:26)

I am a god!

Q: Dear Brother Clark, what does the bible mean in the Psalm when it state “Ye are gods”?

A: The Lord has given us the authority and dominion to be like him in forms of judgment, power and standards, and when we truly represent him we are his children and we are called gods. This doesn’t mean we are almighty God, only that we represent God.

The Lord Jesus said “I and my Father are one” so the Jews took up stones to stone him. “I have done many good deeds in your presence which the Father gave me to do; for which one of these do you want to stone me”, Jesus asked? The Jews answered him, saying, “We do not want to stone you because of any good deeds, but because of your blasphemy! You are only a man, but you are trying to make yourself God!”

Jesus answered, “It is written in your own Law that God said, ‘You are gods.’  We know that what the scripture says is true forever; and God called those people gods, the people to whom his message was given. As for me, the Father chose me and sent me into the world. How, then, can you say that I blaspheme because I said that I am the Son of God?  Do not believe me, then, if I am not doing the things my Father wants me to do.   But if I do them, even though you do not believe me, you should at least believe my deeds, in order that you may know once and for all that the Father is in me and that I am in the Father.”   -John 10

We are gods when we are one with God the Almighty. The scripture teaches that we are the sons of God if we are lead by the spirit of God and if we are lead of God we are one with him and we stand in the power as gods over our enemies. Again we’re not the Almighty God, but the power and authority that is given too us when we obey God makes us rulers as gods over our enemy, and over judgments.

In the Psalm it reads, I have said, you are gods, and all of you are sons of the Most High.  Notice how being gods in this context is connected to being a son of God the Most High. Although we are called gods we must not take this out of contexts. It is important to understand thought we stand in the power as gods (judges, preacher, counselors,) if we misrepresent the power God gave us then the Almighty God will judge us and we will be judge as men.

Halloween, The rest of the story

The term Halloween, originally spelled Hallowe’en, is shortened from All Hallows’ Even – e’en is a shortening of even, which is a shortening of evening. It has roots in the Celtic festival of Samhain and the Christian holy day of All Saints.

Halloween’s origins date back to the ancient Celtic festival of Samhain (pronounced sow-in). The Celts, who lived 2,000 years ago in the area that is now Ireland, the United Kingdom, and northern France, celebrated their new year on November 1 and this day marked the end of summer and the harvest and the beginning of the dark, cold winter, a time of year that was often associated with human death. Celts believed that on the night before the new year, the boundary between the worlds of the living and the dead became blurred. On the night of October 31, they celebrated Samhain, when it was believed that the ghosts of the dead returned to earth. In addition to causing trouble and damaging crops, Celts thought that the presence of the otherworldly spirits made it easier for the Druids, or Celtic priests, to make predictions about the future. For a people entirely dependent on the volatile natural world, these prophecies were an important source of comfort and direction during the long, dark winter.

To commemorate the event, Druids built huge sacred bonfires, where the people gathered to burn crops and animals as sacrifices to the Celtic deities.

During the celebration, the Celts wore costumes, typically consisting of animal heads and skins, and attempted to tell each other’s fortunes. When the celebration was over, they re-lit their hearth fires, which they had extinguished earlier that evening, from the sacred bonfire to help protect them during the coming winter.

By A.D. 43, Romans had conquered the majority of Celtic territory. In the course of the four hundred years that they ruled the Celtic lands, two festivals of Roman origin were combined with the traditional Celtic celebration of Samhain. The first was Feralia, a day in late October when the Romans traditionally commemorated the passing of the dead. The second was a day to honor Pomona, the Roman goddess of fruit and trees.

By the 800s, the influence of Catholic Church had spread into Celtic lands. In the seventh century, Pope Boniface IV designated November 1^st All Saints’ Day, a time to honor saints and martyrs. The celebration was also called All-hallows or All-hallowmas (from Middle English Alholowmesse meaning All Saints’ Day) and the night before it, the night of Samhain, began to be called All-hallows Eve and, eventually, Halloween. Even later, in A.D. 1000, the Catholic Church would make November 2^nd All Souls’ Day, a day to honor the dead. It was celebrated similarly to Samhain, with big bonfires, parades, and dressing up in costumes as saints, angels, and devils. Together, the three celebrations, the eve of All Saints’, All Saints’, and All Souls’, were called Hallowmas.

-The History Channel

CLark

Espousal, Marriage, Divorce and Remarriage

Espousal, Marriage, Divorce and Remarriage

The best place to begin a controversial discussion is to start at the beginning, and allow the conversation to find a common ground, a foundation and from the foundation onward the conversation can establish truth. No matter which controversial subject we approach, the idea is to find truth and truth is only in the hands of the Lord. It astonishes me when I converse doctrine with men that are unreachable because of pride, so starting at the beginning can sometimes help destroy the pride that often keeps a great conversation and the search for truth from turning sour. Although this article isn’t a conversation between two people, it is however a study of many years of conversations with men over espousal, marriage, divorce and remarriage. My main goal in this article is to express that knowledge and truth I’ve found over the years in my own personal research and the research of others. They is no intentions here to prove anything to anyone, I can only hope that what I’ve found and hold as truth will spark an examination and or a confirmation of the doctrine we all hold dear.

Espousal:

One of the most critical mistakes believers often make about the espousal is they try to understand ancient espousal-ship by comparing it to America engagement. Espousal-ship is not engagement as defined here in America and when it is compared to the America engagement it’s robbed of its scriptural authority.

In an espousal-ship there is a ceremony in which vows are exchanged a contract is signed, witnesses present and a purchasing of the bride with some sort of token. In the espousal relationship the two are called husband and wife, awaiting only for the bridegroom to come to the house of the bride and carrying her away to complete the marriage ceremony. The espousal-ship is a binding relationship can only be broken with a bill of divorcement.

In the American engagement there are no vows, no contract, or no witnesses, and the couples “aren’t” consider married, but are regarded as to be married. The American engagement is neither recognized as a legal union of a man and woman and the engagement relationship is easily broken for any reason without a bill of divorce. This is certainly not the case with espousal-ship; the relationship is binding by the exchange of vows, the contract, the witnesses and the purchase of the bride. As a matter of fact, there is simply no difference between an actual traditional American marriage ceremony, and the Jewish espousal-ship. The America wedding hold a ceremony where vows are exchanged and a contract is sign, and witnesses are present, afterwards there is what is called a “honeymoon”, where the couple “supposedly” (as the Jewish do) seal the marriage.

The Jewish wedding unlike the America wedding is a two part ceremony with the first part being the espousal (the exchange of vows, the contract, witnesses and token) and then about one or two years the second part took place which completes the ceremony. The second part deals with the husband finally taking his wife home. However, doing the second part there is no need for contracts, vows, or a minister because the couple is already considered married. In fact, if the husband sought to take his wife immediately after completing the first half of the ceremony he could, and no sin would be committed. Now if there was some unknown incompletion in the marriage that kept them from being 100% husband and wife, he couldn’t take her right away. The first part of the ceremony isn’t weaker then the second, because the marriage is bound by the first part not the second.

To avoid committing fornication, couples aren’t allowed to have intercourse without first completing the first part of the ceremony. The first part of the ceremony gives the couple the right to be joined in physical relationship. The first part of the ceremony gives the couple the right to be called “Husband and Wife”.  Thus, understanding espousal is crucial when discussing marriage, divorce and remarriage as they pertain to the bible and our everyday life.

Marriage:

(Gen 2:7)  Then the LORD God took some soil from the ground and formed a man out of it; he breathed life-giving breath into his nostrils and the man began to live.

(Gen 2:18)  Then the LORD God said, “It is not good for the man to live alone. I will make a suitable companion to help him.”

(Gen 2:21-24)  Then the LORD God made the man fall into a deep sleep, and while he was sleeping, he took out one of the man’s ribs and closed up the flesh. He formed a woman out of the rib and brought her to him. Then the man said, “At last, here is one of my own kind— Bone taken from my bone, and flesh from my flesh.’Woman’ is her name because she was taken out of man.” That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united with his wife, and they become one.

God formed man from the ground and he breathed life into his nostrils and the man came alive. Afterward, God cause man to fall into a deep sleep, and while he was sleeping, he took out one of the man’s ribs, closed up the flesh and formed a woman and brought her to him. Adam’s knowledge and prophecy of marriage is the next spectacular thing that happens.

“At last, (Adam says) here is one of my own kind— Bone taken from my bone, and flesh from my flesh. ‘Woman’ is her name because she was taken out of man.” That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united with his wife, and they become one.

Marriage is a union started by God between a man and a woman. Marriage was setup as a relationship that would last as long as both man and women were alive. In the beginning there was no death so the marriage relationship would last forever.  On the other hand, once the first man disobeyed God, sin brought death, and death brought the separation of a relationship that was meant to be forever. Howbeit, because of sin and death, women and men are left widows, widowers, and children are left orphans.

In Matthew 19 Jesus says, “Haven’t you read the scripture that says that in the beginning the Creator made people male and female?  And God said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and unite with his wife, and the two will become one.’ So they are no longer two, but one. No human being must separate, then, what God has joined together.”

Divorce:

The principle of divorce by adultery originated in the Law of Moses, saying, “When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favor in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house”. (Deu 24:1)

Deuteronomy 24 gave the people of Israel permission to divorce by writing a bill of divorcement and placing it in the wife’s hand, and sending her out of the house. The Law of Moses uses the word “uncleanness” but the Lord Jesus while teaching on divorce explains that the “uncleanness” was “fornication” or unfaithfulness. On the other hand, the Jewish rules interpreted “uncleanness” to mean “for whatever” asking the Lord, “Is it lawful (Moses Law) for a man to put away his wife for every cause”?

Jesus answered their question with a question asking, “What law did Moses give you?” The Pharisees quickly turn to Deuteronomy chapter 24 to express the fact that Moses did allow them to put away their wives through a bill of divorcement. However, it is clear through the response of the Lord Jesus that the law of the bill of divorcement was being falsely interpreted by the Pharisees which lead to a massive abuse of the law that was set to protect his people.

But listen to the words of the Lord Jesus. “For the hardness of your heart he wrote you this precept. But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female.  For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife; and they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder”.

It’s here that most people stumble and fall into the same pattern of the Pharisees which held the doctrine of unlawfully putting away their spouses for any reason, only today men command people to be bound to their spouses no matter what they do.

Jesus never communicated this and neither did the Law. Jesus said, “For the hardness of your heart he wrote you this precept”. The word precept means injunction, that is, an authority prescription: – commandment, “LAW”, or an ordinance. So the bill of divorcement is a “Commandment” in the Law that was interjection because of the hardness of the hearts of men. The injunction came after the sole purpose of God from the beginning when he created male and female, desiring that the man would leave his father and mother finding a wife, cleaving to her they being two would because one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder”.

So now, although we understand the mind of God from the beginning when he created male and female we can’t fail to notice the interjection of the bill of divorcement which came because of sin and gave men permission to divorce. The Holy Scriptures says God hates the putting away. Nonetheless, there was still given to the children of Israel a bill of divorcement permitting them to put away the spouse in the case of uncleanness being found in her. Therefore understanding that the LORD hates divorce, married couples should work hard to remain faithful and consecrated to one another, least one of them is found guilty of fornication which can result in the very thing God hates.

Jesus said, “For the hardness of your heart he wrote you this precept”. The Law of divorcement was given because all humanity will not remain faithful to the marriage vow. Historically, when men sent away their wives without a bill of divorcement the women had no one to support them. They couldn’t return to their father’s house and no one was allowed to marry her because she was still bound to her husband. The law of divorce frees women to remarry or to return home.

Deuteronomy 24 gave the people permission to separate and for the reason of uncleanness, so the doctrine teaching people to stay married to a spouse no matter what they do is undeniable rule out once Deuteronomy 24 is understood.

What about Roman 7?

(Rom 7:2-3) For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband. So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man.

There are certain groups prohibiting divorce and remarriage solely on Roman chapter 7. But it’s critical to remember how the same Law gave men the right to put away their spouse when uncleanness is found in her, and the same law allowed the divorcee to remarry after receiving the bill of divorcement.

(Deu 24:1-4) When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house. And when she is departed out of his house, she may go and be another man’s wife. And if the latter husband hate her, and write her a bill of divorcement, and giveth it in her hand, and sendeth her out of his house; or if the latter husband die, which took her to be his wife; Her former husband, which sent her away, may not take her again to be his wife, after that she is defiled; for that is abomination before the LORD: and thou shalt not cause the land to sin, which the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance.

The two authors aren’t in conflict, they’re simply speaking from two difference circumstances, one brings the LAW of Marriage and the other on the Law of Divorcement. Unfaithfulness in a marriage puts the marriage in jeopardy of divorce, however, when there is no unfaithfulness in the marriage the relationship is binding and should extent the life of the couple. Therefore one law doesn’t contradict the other.

It would be a total injustice to quote Romans 7 in the attempt to bind couples together no matter what, and ignore the fact that the same Law allows men to give a bill of divorcement.

Clark

Children in the womb

Publish by Elder K. Clark

It is normally accepted among Churches to believe babies are too young to understand God’s plan for their lives. However I’d like to draw your attention to at least three events in the bible where infants are noted to more intelligent then they are given the credit.

(Gen 25:21-26) Isaac prayed hard to GOD for his wife because she was barren. GOD answered his prayer and Rebekah became pregnant. But the children tumbled and kicked inside her so much that she said, “If this is the way it’s going to be, why go on living?” She went to GOD to find out what was going on. GOD told her, Two nations are in your womb, two peoples butting heads while still in your body. One people will overpower the other, and the older will serve the younger. When her time to give birth came, sure enough, there were twins in her womb. The first came out reddish, as if snugly wrapped in a hairy blanket; they named him Esau (Hairy). His brother followed, his fist clutched tight to Esau’s heel; they named him Jacob (Heel). Isaac was sixty years old when they were born.

(Gen 38:27-30) And it came to pass in the time of Tamar travail, that, behold, twins were in her womb. And it came to pass, when Tamar travailed, that the one put out his hand: and the midwife took and bound upon his hand a scarlet thread, saying, This came out first.  And it came to pass, as he drew back his hand, that, behold, his brother came out: and she said, How hast thou broken forth? this breach be upon thee: therefore his name was called Pharez. And afterward came out his brother, that had the scarlet thread upon his hand: and his name was called Zarah.

(Luke 1:39-44) And Mary arose in those days, and went into the hill country with haste, into a city of Juda; And entered into the house of Zacharias, and saluted Elisabeth. And it came to pass, that, when Elisabeth heard the salutation of Mary, the babe leaped in her womb; and Elisabeth was filled with the Holy Ghost: And she spake out with a loud voice, and said, Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb.  And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me? For, lo, as soon as the voice of thy salutation sounded in mine ears, the babe leaped in my womb for joy.

In order for infants to wrestle in the womb over who will rule over the other they must have some understanding. If this is true then babies are more intelligent and comprehensive to the world then we suppose. Tamar’s had two sons Pharez and Zarah, during the delivery the two battled over who would be born first. The battle was so great that Zarah put out his hand: and the midwife took and bound upon his hand a scarlet thread, saying, this came out first. But to their surprise Pharez was born first and they called his name break out. John the baptizer while in the womb leaped for joy at the voice of Mary. This means infant can respond to us in a very real way. It means they can detect voices and sounds and comprehend them. This also means babies can show emotions of happiness, sadness, anger, and joy in the womb. It has been proven that babies have the ability to choose one favor over another in the womb. The point, babies maybe innocent but they aren’t without understanding as some would care to believe. They can be taught God’s way in the womb.

Uncovering the Undercover “Men”

Published by Elder K. Clark

This article was written to unleash an investigation to uncover the Undercover “Men” in the churches.  My associates and I have proclaimed this investigation to exposes the undercover men to be no more then deceivers of truth.  Perhaps at first glance our investigation may seem worthless or pointless to some.  Nevertheless we assure all that this investigation is indeed necessary to uncover the undercover men stealth like behavior gone undetected by the majority. One of the reasons we decided to launch this international investigation. We realize that the undercover men are misleading people through emotionalism. Thus we believe with the evidence brought forth from this investigation will not only enlighten you to the emotionalism promoted by the men, but also show how  innocence people through their emotionalism have been deceived.

Emotionalism is a term I use to express how certain people support whether something is biblically accurate or not strictly base on how they feel rather then what the bible actually states. Thus, if it feels good then it has to be true.

emotionalism is found in the book of Judges when a time arose that there was no king in Israel, and so every man did that which was right in his own eyes. In the writings of the prophet Solomon he writes; There is a way that seems right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.

The Apostle Paul in his letter to the church in Roman said “Whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our learning, that we through patience and comfort of the scriptures might have hope”. This investigation isn’t against having emotions, for it is apparent that we are emotional creators. However, as the Apostle Paul stated, our emotions has to be lead by what is written if we are to determine true judgment of what is right and wrong. Our own emotions and feeling can consequently deceive us, but when we allow the word of God to lead us, our emotions can take comforted and have hope that we aren’t being lead the wrong way.

This is very important when uncovering the Undercover “Men” in the local and international churches. Because Emotionalism is linked to Humanism, and Humanism is almost always linked to Atheism. Humanism is a very dangerous deception which teaches how truth is found simply in us, and it’s up to us to determine what truth is. This is actually what happened in the book of Judges when a time arose that there was no king in Israel, and so every man did that which was right in his own eyes. Humanism is really emotionalism, which is to rely on ones own feeling to determine truth. Humanism is almost all the time connected with Atheism and Atheism is a disbelief in or denial of the existence of God. If you’re really biblically savvy, you’ve already connected dotes and see the picture of how emotionalism can deceive God’s people to become Atheist.

Emotionalism teaches people to do that which seem right unto them, disregarding God, and every time God is ignored an Atheist is born. “The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God.” For this reason, we have unleashed this investigation to uncover the Undercover “Fools” that are pushing humanism in the churches birthing Atheist.

Atheism denial of the existence of God also causes them to deny the principles found in creationism, and this is the super error of the undercover men as they teach emotionalism above the bible. The undercover men deny the bible principles of creation and this is a very important part of understanding why we must uncover these undercover men in their actions of promoting anti-creationist. We have taken the stand to reject emotionalism and to let God be true and emotionalism a lie. I am sure you are desperately wondering, who are these Undercover “Men”? Well the answer is quite simply. The true identities of the undercover men reveal that the men are really women. Surprised? Not all women, but Women preachers to be exact, male impersonators I call them, working fraud by assuming the appearance of anointed men of God copying their manners or expressions like mimes.

For this cause our investigation took its course to uncover the Undercover “Men” in the churches and to prove to the church that all women operating in the offices of a Pastor, teacher, Apostle, Prophet or an Evangelist is nothing more then a spiritual man and no better then a transvestite with an emotional personal testimony deceiving many.

An emotional personal testimony doesn’t father facts of truth; all testimonies must align themselves with what is written in the scriptures otherwise it will lead people to disregard God and birth humanism and atheism. This investigation says enough to our churches being treated like a gay bar catering to an exclusive revelation of emotions promoted by women preachers. This investigation says enough to women taking center stage spiritually dressed as men singing “Its raining wo-man Hallelujah”, while their male supporter (dressed spiritually as women) cheer Amen. This investigation says enough and No more to homosexual acts of these women.

This investigation says enough to women preachers being out of order and manufacturing queers and weak men by the thousands. This investigation says enough to women preachers failing to condemn the acts of homosexuality, because they are also founded in the same lifestyle spiritually every time she stands in the position to teach men from the scriptures. This investigation says enough to men ordaining women to preach and claiming to be God lead. This investigation says enough to the confusion and violence the women preacher’s movement has cause in the headship and leadership ordain by the Lord in creation by forming “MAN” first and not the woman.

Creation plays a very important part in understanding the present roles of the man and the woman, and for anyone to be pro-women a preacher is to be anti-creation. This is the very reason I brand women that preach as undercover men, because every time they stand in the positions of men claiming to be sent by God they deceive many to act against creation.  Anti-creation is ultimately an attempt to deny that God is the origin of all things. Thus women preachers and their supporters teach an evolutionary indoctrination of emotionalism where by they influence others to become anti Christ.

This atheistic type behavior has blind them to the headship and leadership ordain by the Lord in creation by forming “MAN” first and not the woman.

The authority for women to preach is not found in the scriptures but in a bed of emotional rubbish. There is absolutely no scriptural foundation for women acting the part of a pastor, prophet, teacher, apostle or evangelist and every attempt too by men or women proves to violate the scriptures.

Thus, the purpose of this article is to uncover the fact that these women have manage to seize these position without the biblical permission by taken the anointed word of God and anointed it with their own emotions and promoting it as truth.

Is there other intelligent life out there?

Publish by: Elder K Clark

One day sitting in a restaurant I was approach by one of the waitresses on duty. She eased her way into the chair next to me and somehow we started on the conversation of religion. The conversation almost immediately took a turn once she realized I was a firm advocate of God. So she asked, “Is there other intelligent life out there”? If not, she continues, It would be a total waste of space, what do you think?

It may appear to be a waste to us, I replied, but the bible teaches that all God ’s creation has a purpose.

(Gen 1:14-15)  And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.

God created the other planets to help us divide the day from the night. They were also given to us for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years and to  give light to the earth. God created the other planets to help us remember that he is the origin of all intelligent life.  So you do believe there’s other life forms out there, she asked?  Of course! I answered.  Excited she says, I knew it! I then replied, yeah the bible refer to them as angels , but if you’re thinking of some green critter zooming through space in high-tech space craft, nah, that’s Hollywood.

You must remember, I continued to explain, that the earth is the object of focus. Although God created the other planets He placed strong emphasis on Earth. In the beginning God created the heaven, and the earth Genesis 1:1. The heaven consist of the other planets, stars and galaxies, however the earth is singled out for a special purpose above the rest of the  planets.  Again I believe there are other life forms which God created and those life forms are called angels which are made to minister to us that are heirs of salvation.

Elisha prayed, and said, LORD, I pray thee, open his eyes, that he may see. And the LORD opened the eyes of the young man; and he saw: and, behold, the mountain was full of horses and chariots of fire round about Elisha. 2Ki 6:17

Those horses and chariots of fire round about Elisha were angels sent to help the prophet of God. There are many accounts of angels appearing too many prophets. Abraham talked with them and Jacob wrestled with them. The Lord Jesus was made a little lower then the angels, thus, a little lower then angels you have humans. This would mean there is nothing in between us and them in creation. This leaves God, angels, and then humans, with that said, I can’t not accept any other intelligent life out there.

Clark

The Diagnostics of “ADDS” in the Church

Publish by Elder K. Clark

This article was written as a warning of the possibility of a widespread deadly disease circulating in the churches. This article objective is to raise the red flag of awareness to give the church the proper guidelines to identify the strong symptoms of this deadly disease.  We have concluded that the symptoms can be undetectable for years leaving the possibility of treatments ineffective. Therefore, if the church you attend has come in contact with this fatal disease please seek immediate attention.

We are categorizing this disease by the name ADDS. ADDS stands for Apostles Doctrine Deficiency Syndrome. This dangerous disease without warning kills thousands of churches hourly. But we have taken a strong position to enlighten the churches with the guidelines given in this article to detect the symptoms that have lead to the tragic deaths in the local churches.

The cause of (ADDS) is now known to be due to a long-term deficiency of the Apostles biblical guidelines, practices and regulations in the churches. ADDS is known to be a transmitted disease through fellowship and compromise. ADDS is a very dangerous phenomenon and it is highly recommended once diagnose the church seek immediate attention to prevent the removal of the candlestick (spirit of God) out of it place.

Heretics were commonly responsible for the cause of ADDS, but the virus has now reached throughout churches that once held steadfast to the Apostles doctrine. ADDS breaks down the Apostles Doctrine by (AFI) a false interpretation. Once the Apostles doctrine is broken down by (AFI), the protected system preserved to help the church fight against sin is left defenseless. ADDS, is a deadly but pain free disease attacking the spiritual eyes, feelings and consciences, again, we highly recommended once diagnose the church seek immediate attention to prevent sudden death.

Description of Symptoms

There’re a large group of symptoms, so please take note of the following indications, one or more of these symptoms found in the churches can possible be a sign of a serious case of ADDS

• (HIO) Homosexuals in offices
• (WP) Women Preachers
• (T) Trinity Doctrine
• (PGIG) Prosperity (gain is godliness)
• (SP) Sinner’s prayer
• (AC) Altar Calls
• (CH) Celebrating Holidays
• (PTD) Pre-Tribs Doctrine
• (P) Preterits
• (OSAS) Once save always save
• (A) Alogi
• (J) Judaism
• (SBR) Save by race
• (URM) Unlawful remarriage
• (SK) Sabbath keeping
• (W) Worldliness
• (FM) Forbidding to marry
• (DL) Dietary Laws
• (LOT) Laws to observe Times
• (URM) Un-ordained ministers
• (Rap) Rappers
• (PRD) Praise dancers
• (RJ) Rejecters of Hell
• (A) Astrology

Be careful to consider the symptoms shows here, you could be at serious risk.  ADDS develops rapidly, killing the electrical activity of brain spiritually paralyzing its victims. This article has the potential to become the most important weapon in the diagnostics Apostles Doctrine Deficiency Syndrome. Significantly enough, this phenomenon doesn’t have to be your end. There is a cure, renounce all falsehood and be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ and be clean, and may the LORD of Glory keep you and present you holy before his coming. Amen

Is Mohammad the Comforter?

Publish by Elder K. Clark

Is Mohammed the Comforter as spoken by Jesus?

(John 14:16-18) And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you. I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you.

The Comforter is suppose to abide with us forever.
The Comforter is a spirit
The Comforter was with the apostles
The Comforter would dwell in us.

John 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

The Comforter is the HOLY GHOST!
The Comforter would be sent in Jesus name.
The Comforter would remind us what Jesus said.

(John 15:26-27) But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceeded from the Father, he shall testify of me: And ye also shall bear witness, because ye have been with me from the beginning.

The Comforter is the spirit of truth which comes from the Father
The Comforter will testify of Jesus.
The Comforter would agree with the Apostles.

(John 16:7-8) Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you. And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment:


The Comforter will be send by Jesus and he will reprove the world of SIN and righteousness and judgment.

(John 16:13-14) Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come. He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you.

The Comforter will guide us into truth, NOT speak of himself but speak what he hears and show us the future.

The Comforter will Glorify Jesus, he shall receive revelation by Jesus and show it to us.

The Mohammed Comforter Test.

The Comforter is suppose to abide with us forever. – Did Mohammed abide forever with the apostles and us? NO, therefore he failed to be the Comforter.

The Comforter is a spirit. – Was Mohammed a spirit or human? Human, therefore, he failed to be the Comforter.

The Comforter was with the apostles. – Was Mohammed with the Apostles during the life of Christ or after Christ? NO, therefore, he failed to be the Comforter.

The Comforter would dwell in us. Does Mohammed live in the Apostles and us today? No, therefore, he failed to be the Comforter.

The Comforter is the HOLY GHOST! Is Mohammed the HOLY GHOST? No, therefore, he failed to be the Comforter.

The Comforter would be sent in Jesus name. Did Mohammed claim to come in the name of Jesus? NO, therefore he failed to be the Comforter.

The Comforter would remind us what Jesus said. Did Mohammed remind the world of Jesus? NO, therefore he failed to be the Comforter.

The Comforter is the spirit of truth which comes from the Father. Did Mohammed to come from the father? NO, therefore he failed to be the Comforter.

The Comforter will testify of Jesus. Did Mohammad testify of Jesus? Yes in part, but he has already failed to be the Comforter.

The Comforter would agree with the Apostles. Did Mohammad agree with the testimonies of the Apostles? NO, therefore he failed to be the Comforter.

The Comforter will be send by Jesus and he will reprove the world of SIN and righteousness and judgment. Was Mohammad sent by Jesus? NO, and Did Mohammad SIN? YES, therefore he failed to be the Comforter.

The Comforter will guide us into truth, NOT speak of himself but speak what he hears and show us the future. Did Mohammed guide people into truth? NO, therefore he failed to be the Comforter.

The Comforter will Glorify Jesus, he shall receive revelation by Jesus and show it to us. Did Mohammed receive revelation by Jesus? NO, therefore he failed to be the Comforter.

Mohammad fail the Comforter test. He can not be consider the Comforter because he did not fulfill the necessary characteristics and services Christ spoke of. Therefore Mohammad is disqualified as being the Comforter.

Is Isaiah talking about Mohammed?

Isaiah 29:12
And the book is delivered to him that is not learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I am not learned.

Muslims lay claim to this verse because Mohammad was a uneducated man and couldn’t read or write. Perhaps after reading this portion of the bible’s defense against the Muslims illusion of Mohammad prophecy in the bible, you will recognize just how desperate the Muslims community really is. The Muslims are really great at finding one verse in the bible and claiming it as proof of the foretelling of the coming of Mohammad. However, it doesn’t take a very educated person to realize that Isaiah prophecy had nothing to do with Mohammad. What I’d like to do is to start reading Isaiah 29 from verse 9, through 13 and after reading these verses you clearly see that Mohammad is not the focus and if he is the focus the Muslim community is in some serious trouble.

Isaiah 29:9 Stay yourselves, and wonder; cry ye out, and cry: they are drunken, but not with wine; they stagger, but not with strong drink.

Isaiah 29:10 For the LORD hath poured out upon you the spirit of deep sleep, and hath closed your eyes: the prophets and your rulers, the seers hath he covered.

Isaiah 29:11 And the vision of all is become unto you as the words of a book that is sealed, which men deliver to one that is learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I cannot; for it is sealed:

Isaiah 29:12 And the book is delivered to him that is not learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I am not learned.

Isaiah 29:13 Wherefore the Lord said, Forasmuch as this people draw near me with their mouth, and with their lips do honour me, but have removed their heart far from me, and their fear toward me is taught by the precept of men.

CLARK

Who is that Prophet that is to come?

Published by Elder K. Clark

This article is the result of a conversation I had with a Muslim over whether Muhammad is found in the bible. This discussion start with the Muslim fellow asserting that Moses prophecy of the prophet like unto himself is fulfilled in Muhammad. Below is my rely to the Muslim claims.

(John 1:45) Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.

(John 6:13-14) Therefore they gathered them together, and filled twelve baskets with the fragments of the five barley loaves, which remained over and above unto them that had eaten. Then those men, when they had seen the miracle that Jesus did, said, This is of a truth that prophet that should come into the world.

(Act 3:20-24) And he (God) shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you: Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began. For Moses truly said unto the fathers, (speaking of Jesus) A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you. And it shall come to pass, that every soul, which will not hear that prophet, shall be destroyed from among the people. Yea, and all the prophets from Samuel and those that follow after, as many as have spoken, have likewise foretold of these days. –Apostle Peter.

There are many biblical witnesses testifying that Jesus was that prophet spoken by all the prophets before him. I’d really like to see scriptures from the Quran supporting these claims from the Muslim world.  If Mohammad is the fulfillment of Moses prophecy then it ought to be plainly written in the Quran as it is in the bible about Jesus. “Out of the Mouth of TWO or THREE witnesses let every word be confirmed”. Don’t post mysterious verses I want to see it as plain as it is stated in the bible about Jesus. If you can’t produce these scriptures from the Quran then your claim is just a worthless claim.

Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me. (John 5:39)

Search the scriptures? The scriptures mention by Jesus are those writing by Moses and the other prophets up unto the time of his life. Jesus commanding us to search Moses and the Prophets because they testify of him. Simple enough right? But what is Jesus really saying? Jesus is declaring that all the scriptures speak of him. Besides Jesus, no other prophet has ever claimed to be the center of all prophecy.

Jesus also said, Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. (Matthew 5:17)

Pay close attention, “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets” . Think not that I’ve come to destroy what Moses and the prophets said, no, not to destroy but to fulfill. Again Jesus claims to have come to fulfill the things written by Moses and the prophets. The Muslim community wants us to believe Mohammad was the fulfillment and final prophet. But what did Jesus say when it was asked was he the last prophet?

Now when John had heard in the prison the works of Christ, he sent two of his disciples, And said unto him, Art thou he that should come, or do we look for another? (Mat 11:2-3)

Notice the question, “Art thou “HE” that should come”. This means the people was looking for ONE to come not two or three. They were looking for one great messenger and after him there would be no other, and if Christ was “HE” then there was no need to continue to look. So Jesus, “Art thou “HE” that should come or do we look for another”? Jesus answered: Go and tell John again those things which ye do hear and see: The blind receive their sight, and the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, and the deaf hear, the dead are raised up, and the poor have the gospel preached to them.

This may not make sense to the average person. However, Jesus was quoting Isaiah 35 which says “Strengthen you the weak hands, and confirm the feeble knees. Say to them that are of a fearful heart, be strong, and fear not: behold, your God will come with vengeance, even God with recompense; he will come and save you. Then the eyes of the blind shall be opened, and the ears of the deaf shall be unstopped. Then shall the lame man leap as a hart, and the tongue of the dumb sing: for in the wilderness shall waters break out, and streams in the desert.” (Isaiah 35:3-6)

Jesus quote Isaiah to comfort John the baptizer that he was the last messenger that would establish the way of God before God‘s final return (please read Isaiah 35). How so? Because Isaiah and Moses spoke of the same messenger that would come. The scriptures all point to ONE messenger “HE” not them. Now let’s look closer at some of the illusions the Muslim community assumes is speaking of Mohammad.

(1 Deuteronomy 18:18) I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him.

What does the bible say about this scripture and the fulfillment  of it?

(John 1:45) Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.

(John 6:13-14) Therefore they gathered them together, and filled twelve baskets with the fragments of the five barley loaves, which remained over and above unto them that had eaten. Then those men, when they had seen the miracle that Jesus did, said, “This is of a truth that prophet that should come into the world.”

(Act 3:20-24) And he (God) shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you: Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began. For Moses truly said unto the fathers, (speaking of Jesus) A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you. And it shall come to pass, that every soul, which will not hear that prophet, shall be destroyed from among the people. Yea, and all the prophets from Samuel and those that follow after, as many as have spoken, have likewise foretold of these days. –Apostle Peter

Before Mohammad was born the Apostles was preaching that Jesus was the fulfillment of the writing of Moses. So who should we believe? Writing that were written in the 1st two centuries by the Apostles and followers of Jesus or those writing of men 700 years after the death of Christ by the follower of Mohammad?

MORE MUSLIM TAKE (CLICLHERE)

CLARK